Now that we’ve established who some of the names BC could be looking at are, BCI is going to do some more in-depth profiles for some of those names. We begin with Luke Murray, whose name has been linked to not just the BC job but also that of Providence and Syracuse. According to his boss, Dan Hurley, the UConn assistant is more than prepared for a head coaching gig of his own. Could BC be his next stop?
Murray began his coaching career in 2008 at Post University. He has since made stops at Arizona, Wagner, Towson, Rhode Island, Xavier, and Louisville prior to arriving at UConn. He signed a three-year contract extension with the Huskies in 2024, and he reportedly makes around $800,000 per year. He’s 40 years old and originally from the Northeast.
Why he’d be interested:
Murray has never held a head coaching position. The attractions of doing so are pretty clear. The first, and most obvious, is the money. Earl Grant made $2.4 million dollars in 2024-2025. Assuming Murray’s $800,000 figure is roughly correct, he’d be tripling his salary (and Boston College may be able to pony up some additional money if they feel Murray is absolutely the right guy; look at the O’Brien hire).
Beyond the money, the BC job is less than 2 hours away from UConn. Murray would barely have to move. He’s familiar with basketball in the Northeast, and presumably he’d have a more comfortable base of recruiting operations to build out his own program. The administration’s lack of interest carries greater cons than pros, but one limited benefit is that the job is relatively low pressure for high major hoops. Murray could cut his teeth figuring out how he wants to run his program, and he’ll likely be given a longer runway to do so. If he finds success, he’ll no doubt be able to parlay that success into a better job. If he does not find success, chances are he’ll get another shot from a program that believes winning at BC is simply impossible.
Why it could work:
Two reasons. We’ll start with Murray’s offensive acumen. Since the 2022-2023 season, UConn’s basketball program has featured perhaps the best offensive system in the country. That system propelled the Huskies to back-to-back national championships in one of the most dominant two-year runs the sport has ever seen. Murray cannot take all of the credit for that offensive explosion, but there is 0 doubt he was instrumental to it.
Murray and Hurley worked to base their offense around a constant flow of off-ball screens. The never-ending array of cuts, screens, and movement puts enormous strain on the defense; they essentially cannot afford to make a mistake in coverage. One misstep, poor switch, or late rotation and the Huskies punish the opening. The defense’s decision-making has to be flawless. Murray and Hurley have also been pretty open around their relentless pursuit of improvement; UConn has notoriously even looked to Europe to incorporate new wrinkles to the system.
If Murray were to head to Chestnut Hill, one thing you can be sure of is that he’d bring a stronger offensive identity than Earl Grant. I doubt he’d run the same system that he did in Storrs, but he’s proven that he knows how to design and execute offense at the highest level. That would give him instant cache with recruits, (more on that in a minute), as he’d be able to sell players on their role within his scheme.
Secondly, Murray is an excellent recruiter and developer of talent. He’s worked mostly with bigs during his time at UConn. Just look at some of the guys he’s worked with: Adam Sanogo. Donovan Clingan. Samson Johnson. Tarris Reed Jr. The list goes on. As a young, hungry coach from the Northeast, the hope is that he would be able to inject BC’s recruiting with some life and excitement.
Why it could flop:
The clearest reason, as I mentioned in my article earlier this week, is a lack of experience. We simply just do not know what Murray will look like as a head coach.
Another issue is what his system looks like without the elite talent he’s been able to work with. Even if he is able to improve BC’s recruiting, I do not think there is a coach in America who would be able to start putting together recruiting classes in the same tier as UConn’s, or any other blue bloods’. There simply are not enough resources in Chestnut Hill to attract talent like [take your pick of elite freshmen]. UConn’s system is certainly elite, but that is in part because UConn gets the guys they want. Can Murray do more with less? Can his comfort in the Northeast, his tactical acumen, and his skills in attracting and developing players overcome the chronic apathy at BC for men’s basketball? That is the million-dollar-question for Murray (and, frankly, anyone BC is considering for the job).
How likely is this hire?
From a BC perspective, there are few names connected to the job that would generate more buzz than Murray. I think he’d do well in marketing and representing the program, and high risk/high reward, flashier hires tend to bring a bit more excitement than safer, mid major promotion options.
Murray, however, holds all the cards. He’s been linked to the openings at Providence and Syracuse, and he has one of the best assistant gigs in the country. How eager is he to get his own program? He has the ability to be picky. For that reason, I think Murray is more of a long shot — though not out of the realm of possibility. I think he’s probably in BC’s top five candidates, but outside that number in terms of likeliest to end up with the job.
About the Author
